For our next mental exercise we will choose another
simple subject that can have many meanings. It would be tempting to go for
‘Love’ because Roget’s
Thesaurus has
something like 33 entries, while the opposite, ‘Hate’ only has nine! This means
we’re going to have to work harder and delve deeper.
Firstly, we need to define what we mean by ‘hate’
because it is a word that is over-used today. We may say we ‘hate spiders’ but do
we really? We may feel frightened, repulsed or nauseated by them – but hate?
The dictionary definition of hate is: “Extreme dislike
or aversion; detestation; to abhor or detest; enmity or ill-will; loathing”, while the on-line Wikipedia
has hatred (or hate) as an intense feeling of dislike. “It may occur in a wide
variety of contexts, from hatred of inanimate objects or animals, to hatred of
oneself or other people, entire groups of people, people in general, existence,
or everything.”
The depth of expression is largely dependant on the
person making the declaration, or the circumstances under which the declaration
is made. A trivial person will ‘hate’ anything and everything that they don’t
like, from cabbage to an unimaginative wedding present. Someone else may
actively hate racial inequality or social injustice, but on the other side of
the coin in living memory we have had Holocaust that resulted from Nazi hatred
of the Jews. Of the fictional variety, the character of
Edmond Dantes in The Count of Monte Cristo gives us an epic tale of
hatred and revenge. Very few of us would, if we were completely honest, have
ever really experienced the true emotion of hatred but there are nine category
listed in the Polti Theory that could be fuelled by hatred:
·
Crime
pursued by vengeance
·
Vengeance
taken for kindred upon kindred
·
Revolt
·
Enmity
of kinsmen
·
Murderous
adultery
·
Madness
·
Discovery
of the dishonour of a loved one
·
Mistaken
jealousy
·
Erroneous
judgement
Using the same lateral thinking, what, for example,
would you consider to be the greatest love story ever written? After careful consideration,
my choices (and for totally
different reasons) would be a toss-up between Wuthering Heights and The
Lord of the Rings.
In terms of romantic love, the destructive tide of passion that drives both
Catherine and Heathcliffe, renders all other fictional lovers superfluous. The
type of love contained within The
Lord of the Rings is
the bond or spark that exists between the ‘Fellowship’ and is expressed in
terms of loyalty and comradeship against over-whelming odds. The actual
romantic interlude pales into insignificance beside the heroic deeds of those
fighting together against Mordor. On a purely personal level, both novels can
still produce that gut-churning, throat-tightening feeling no matter how many times
I read them, and yet neither would qualify as ‘love stories’ in the traditional
sense of the word.
When we refer to ‘love’ in our own writing, we are
going to use it in the context of the storyline to give the work ‘reader
appeal’. We can use it in the bitter, destructive context of the television
series, Mother
Love,
which starred Diana Rigg in the title role. Or the desperate variety of Bridget Jones’ Diary. Or the escapism of Shirley Valentine. Love does not necessarily
mean ‘romance’ in Mills & Boon mould and although we might couch it in different
terms, it still makes the world go round. Love and hate are highly emotive
subjects, so handle with care!
Secret Step Three reveals that no matter how
mundane and/or familiar a scene, there are countless different angles from which
to view it. Emotions are the very life-blood of creative writing whether we are
utilising them in fiction, non-fiction or poetry. Described as ‘the various
phenomena of the mind’
(including anger, joy, fear, sorrow, etc), we also use
them to arouse those emotions in our readers – to make them care about what they read. Emotions are also
extremely complex and we can weave a tangled web of intense feeling within our
writing to force our readers to suffer along with our characters, article content
or poem.
Neither can emotion (or the reason behind it) be cast
in stone. We can be angry – but anger is rarely generated by one single action.
It has usually been compounded by numerous smaller, insignificant happenings.
We need to create these multi-layers in our writing, especially when creating
characters for a novel, because without them the finished piece will lack
depth. There was a popular method of encouraging lateral thinking in business
management training back in the 1970s called ‘mind mapping’. It was an
idea-generating technique that breaks down linear thinking – thinking in
straight lines – and encourages the mind to work laterally by accessing our
‘zip-files’ in the right-brain. Instead of running ideas in a straightforward
top-to-bottom list, start by placing the key word in the centre of the page and
circle it. As word-association triggers off other ideas, write them down and
circle them, linking them to the key word and each other with connecting lines.
For this exercise we start with the key-word = fear. As
the circles move outwards, we can travel a long way from that original
key-word. We may find we’ve thrown in things that would never have occurred to
us when using lists to flesh out a story or article. Mapping is also a useful technique
for developing plots and characters and can be included in your Ideas Book when
you are stuck for ideas, or don’t know where to go next.
Whenever you feel the urge
to make a list of ideas,
use this
mapping technique instead. You may find that
it can even replace doodling when you’re on the telephone.